seksualna revolucija, part deux?

Zanimiv članek iz NY Timesa (via Marginal Revolution) o organiziranosti pedofilov. Ne toliko o mrežah za izmenjavo pornografije, kot o podpornih skupinah, forumih, blogih, podcastih na katerih drug drugemu odpuščajo grehe.

“My daughter and I have a healthy close relationship,” a person with the screen name Sonali posted. “We have been in a ‘consensual sexual relationship’ almost two months now.”

The daughter, Sonali wrote, is 10. Whatever guilt Sonali felt for the relationship was eased by the postings of other pedophiles. “I am so happy to find this site,” Sonali wrote. “I thought having a sexual attraction to my daughter was bad. I now do not feel guilty or conflicted.”

Sebe si predstavljajo kot zaščitnike otrok in se zavzemajo za sproščanje omejitev glede minimalne privolitvene starosti. Tiskajo knjižice za osveščanje otrok o seksu z odraslimi in svoj “cause” jemljejo smrtno resno

But in other discussions, pedophiles cautioned that some comments were too dangerous. When one man described in lurid terms his fantasies about molesting an infant girl, the response was quick. “This is best not discussed,” a man calling himself garvy wrote, adding that someday, pedophiles would need evidence proving that they cared only about children’s best interests.

“Such posts,” garvy concluded, “will be very damaging to the Cause.”

Po besedah novinarjev, ki so se nekaj mesecev ukvarjali s to zgodbo, se pogosto zdi, da si udeleženci forumov ustvarjajo neko alternativno realnost:

For example, a man calling himself AtosW reported to fellow pedophiles that he had been chatting on a game site frequented by boys. A conversation began about the Dutch pedophile party, AtosW said, and the minors reacted with threats of violence.

AtosW was perplexed. “Why are posters THAT young so angry about it?” he asked. “It is after all THEIR rights that they are pushing for.”

Zajebano.